+44(0)1689 258 210 | enquiries@e-focusmarketing.com
- Our CRM Methodology
- CRM Strategy Solutions
- CRM Resources
- Supper Club
- Contact
+44(0)1689 258 210 | enquiries@e-focusmarketing.com
A Next Best Customer Decision™ is the decision a brand enables that creates the greatest value for the customer at that moment in their relationship with the business.
It has to be valuable to the customer and to the organisation, and long-term value takes precedence over short-term performance.
This is not a campaign planning framework, a journey mapping framework or an automation framework. It is a decision-making framework, and it is the one that decides where your budget goes first.
Most CRM teams are not short of ideas. There is a backlog of them: stakeholder requests, agency suggestions, a competitor’s welcome flow somebody screenshotted, three more things the platform vendor says the tool can do.
What is missing is a defensible way to rank them. So the list gets ordered by urgency, by seniority, or by whatever is quickest to build.
Prioritisation, not inspiration, is the immediate need in almost every CRM programme I see. Teams do not need another good idea. They need a reason to do this one before that one that they can take upstairs and defend.
Ask yourself how your current roadmap was actually ordered. If the honest answer is a mix of urgency and seniority, that is the gap this framework exists to close.
Every candidate decision is scored one to five against each of the five tests, giving it a total out of twenty-five. No weighting is applied, because weighting is where politics re-enters a process designed to remove it. A decision that scores well on customer value and badly on delivery is not a good decision yet, and the score says so.
Will this strengthen the customer relationship?
The first question is never what the business gets. It is whether the customer’s position improves, judged against the five Customer Momentum™ drivers: does it strengthen trust, create value, reduce effort, increase relevance or enable progress?
A decision that scores nothing here is a campaign wearing a strategy’s clothes.
Will this improve business performance?
Customer value that never becomes commercial value is a hobby. This test asks what specifically moves: revenue, retention, lifetime value, conversion, or cost to serve, and by roughly how much.
Being explicit here is what lets you say no to the pleasant-but-immaterial ideas without an argument.
Does this align with where the business is actually going?
A decision can be good for the customer, good for the numbers, and still wrong for this year. If the business is pushing into a new category or repositioning around a different audience, decisions that reinforce the old shape score badly no matter how well they would perform.
Do we have enough evidence to support this?
This is the test that separates a strategy from a set of opinions. Every decision should trace back to something observed, usually Customer Drift™ evidence in your own data, rather than to a best-practice article or a competitor’s homepage.
Low evidence does not kill a decision. It reframes it as something to test first rather than something to build.
Can we realistically deliver this well?
The test most frameworks leave out, and the reason most CRM roadmaps stall. A decision your team, data or platform cannot support is not a priority, it is a future disappointment with a start date.
This is why the CRM Maturity Model runs before any of this: capability context is what makes the Delivery Test honest rather than optimistic.
Understand consolidates every strategic decision opportunity already surfaced by Customer Drift™ and Customer Momentum™, read alongside customer insight, commercial insight and business context. It deliberately generates nothing new. Its job is to make sure nothing is missing before anything gets ranked.
Balance scores each candidate against the five Decision Tests above, so customer value and commercial value are weighed against each other explicitly rather than argued about implicitly.
Decide produces the Decision Portfolio: every decision ranked by score, each with a Decision Statement saying what it is and why it is prioritised, an Expected Relationship Outcome and an Expected Commercial Outcome.
All three sit inside Discover. The Decision Portfolio is what Discover hands to Grow.
The Next Best Customer Decision™ Framework is one of the three Discover components of the eFocus Customer Progression Model, alongside Customer Drift and Customer Momentum.
Drift diagnoses where relationships are weakening. Momentum supplies the principles that would strengthen them. This framework decides which of those decisions to make first, and turns them into a ranked Decision Portfolio.
A Customer Momentum Review is the diagnostic engagement that runs all three together and hands you the portfolio at the end of it.
No. A roadmap says what you are doing and when. The Decision Portfolio says why those things are in that order, scored against five explicit tests, which is what makes it defensible when someone senior wants their idea moved up.
Then it scores low on the Evidence Test, which does not kill it. It reclassifies it: it becomes something to test rather than something to build, and the Testing Framework picks it up from there.
Whoever owns the budget and whoever owns delivery, at minimum. The Delivery Test is worthless if the person who knows what the team can actually absorb is not there to answer it.
Every quarter as a rule, and immediately whenever new drift evidence appears. Customer expectations, technology and markets all move, so the next best decision today may not be the next best decision in six months.
Yes, on a single decision or a small backlog. The Review is what gives you the drift evidence and capability context that make the Evidence and Delivery Tests meaningful, so scoring without it relies more on judgement and less on data.